2017 Blackhawks

Discussion in 'Chicago Blackhawks' started by hockeybob, May 24, 2016.

  1. hockeybob Hall-of-Fame Blackhawks

    2016 is in the books.

    Bowman spent more of his owners money on salaries than any other gm.
    The cap crunch, chapter 6, is underway.

    Kruger getting a raise to 2.85.
    Shaw due a big raise
    Scuderi eating 1.125 of dead space
    Bonus money to Panarin and Roszival is measured in millions
    Bickell's 4 million dollar cap hit still has to be moved
    Seabrook's raise kicks in
    Hossa thrived as a 3rd line RW for 5.25 against the cap

    Other stuff:
    Expansion news will impact roster management.
    No first or 2nd round pick this year right now
    Prospect pool is pretty light
    Schmaltz still hasn't signed a contract
    Forsling did sign a contract
    Q and Bowman signed for 4 or 5 more years

    So business as normal for the Hawks. Up against the cap, depth is very suspect, a few players racking up the miles and lots of bloated contracts are in the way.

    First significant move for Bowman:

    Should be a nice addition to the blueline's bottom pair, maybe even the 4 slot. I have no idea how his game will translate to the NHL. Kempny is nice UDFA signing, and since he's an ELC, the likelihood of getting a better addition cheaper is slim and none right now.
     
  2. KilkennyDan Let's Go Buffalo! Patreon Champion Sabres Bills Kilkenny

    Was hoping the Sabres would land Kempny. They're in on most UDFA's, which is a nice change from a couple years ago. But, other than MN State Nelson, it looks like they go somewhere else.

    Chicago still has a huge advantage because they're winners. It's a great signing for the Hawks just like the Calder* winner was a year ago. (* Chicago will get the Calder this year.) It's all part of their mastery of skirting around cap restraints.

    I, BTW, have come around to thinking that Shaw could be a fit in Buffalo. I'll still think of him as a nut jabbing asswipe.
     
  3. hockeybob Hall-of-Fame Blackhawks

    As you should.

    Lots of good trade scenarios, or at least ones that make sense, since Buffalo wants to start winning before everybody becomes more expensive and Chicago needs cost controlled depth.

    I think Ristolainen is going to conduct a national awakening next year. I will happily give you Seabrook and Shaw and other things.
     
  4. KilkennyDan Let's Go Buffalo! Patreon Champion Sabres Bills Kilkenny

    Uh, Bob, you're not bringing Rasmus into this discussion, are you?

    Listen to what TM has to say to that ...

    ...
    ...
    brpppp, brpppp, brpppp
     
  5. Mackladder Franchise Player Bears

  6. hockeybob Hall-of-Fame Blackhawks

    Campbell is definitely interested in Chicago.
    He was out honing his soccer skillz with 3 and 4 year olds this weekend in the west suburbs. He's established in the area still. I think he runs his charity stuff out of Chicago too.

    Unless they found structural damage on Anisimov's body, I don't want him traded just to keep Shaw. When the time comes, he'll be an expansion draft casualty and then CHicago will fill the role with maybe Schmaltz or one of the Euro UFAs.
     
  7. hockeybob Hall-of-Fame Blackhawks

  8. Mackladder Franchise Player Bears

    Interesting article for sure , Stan has his work cut out for him once again.
     
  9. Mackladder Franchise Player Bears

  10. hockeybob Hall-of-Fame Blackhawks

    This is pretty much a disaster of a trade barring another major transaction, meaning a trade.

    There just isn't enough gain from this move compared to a buyout.

    If they weren't moving Teravainen out to assure a landing spot for another team's malcontent or a unsigned FA like Vesey, this move is a borderline disaster for a team looking to contend with a top heavy roster.

    We'll see what happens. I was able to make sense of the Sharp trade (declining player on huge cap hit that overlapped with 2 years of T+K) right away. Daley plugged a hole on paper, it made sense even though it worked out poorly. Trading Saad landed another LW option and plugged the gigantic 2C hole while giving some capspace to boot. It stung but the trades made sense.

    In this case, as it stands today, it doesn't make sense if they plan on contending. Bickell was eligible to be bought out. Teravainen wasn't going to be a superstar next year, but he was going to out play his cap hit and that's something this roster doesn't have enough of.
     
  11. hockeybob Hall-of-Fame Blackhawks

    If they extend Shaw on a bloated contract like Kruger, I'm going to be chugging the haterade all summer unless they makes some very creative moves.
     
  12. Mackladder Franchise Player Bears

    I have a feeling that may be what their looking to do but as usual we will see what Stan the Man has in mind moving forward.
     
  13. hockeybob Hall-of-Fame Blackhawks

    All the arrows are pointing to a Shaw extension.
    I'm not a fan of a player like Shaw getting a big contract so I anxiously await arrows pointing a different direction. Already too tough for Kruger to play to his contract.
     
  14. mattymcgee55 Legend Patriots Bruins

    Tindy for Loui would've been a win/win at the deadline. could throw Bickell in there too.
     
  15. rediiis Guest

    nick schmaltz gets signed, dammit I was hoping for a Vesey.
     
  16. Mackladder Franchise Player Bears

  17. mattymcgee55 Legend Patriots Bruins

    [​IMG]

    Lucas Carlsson
     
  18. Willie Head Coach Manager News & Notes Vikings

    Thats why you play the body, not the puck... wow.
     
  19. hockeybob Hall-of-Fame Blackhawks

    I liked the direction of their picks, but those later 2 2nds looked like guys they may have been targeting a little later than they were picking. Tough to say. I'm of the opinion they weren't ready for a Shaw trade that landed them 2 16' 2nd rounders.
     
  20. KilkennyDan Let's Go Buffalo! Patreon Champion Sabres Bills Kilkenny

    I kinda pull for the Hawks so this is not a butthurt motivated comment. I took DeBrincat off my Sabres board (not that TM cared).

    There's small, fast, & tough. And, there's small, fast, fragile, and quite possibly stupid. I hope I'm proven wrong when I place Alex in the second group.
     

Share This Page