Greater, better - whichever comparative you want to use, Staubach (and Marino and Young) top Plunkett across the board.
No, the point of the season is to win the Super Bowl, and just like Emmit having accomplished more yards than anyone and being greater, Plunkett accomplished the greatness measure further than Marino or Young. They both were better than Plunkett tho.
Sooooo... although you were better than so-and-so, but not as good as some other QB, you were still the GOAT. Makes perfect sense.
No, it means you can be a better QB, but not accomplish the goal as much as someone lesser. You could be the Best QB ever, and not be the greatest because you failed when it counted.
So if a QB played 20 years in the league and went to the SB all 20 times but lost 4 of them while winning 16 and winning SB MVP 16 times.....he'd be ineligible for GOAT?
Yes much like that, I guess because I never said that. What I said was if you have to inflate your SOG well beyond everyone else, every year, you aren't a sniper, or as good as people think. I never said, except in blurb jests, that Ovary sucked, just that he only has so many goals because he has way more chances to get them than any normal hockey player, or actual Great.
Snipers don't miss... often. 0vul8r misses... a lot. Not a sniper. TEH PHIL is more of a sniper than Ovi.
Exactly my point, OV is a machine gunner. He still gets lots of kills(goals) just by shooting more bullets than anyone else.
No such thing, but you cleary demonstrated that you don't understand "greatness" in terms of a QB. No wonder you are relegated to being a Bears fan.