Doesn't matter.. take QB #1 overall, don't chance anything. Just identify who you believe is the best in this draft and take him. Either Barkley or Chubb will be there at #4, so no need to get cute. I'm seeing this as a real possibility: #1 Mayfield/Darnold #4 **trade** #12 Ward/Roquon Smith/Edmunds/Josh Kackson #22 Mike McGlinchey #33 Michel/Guiece #35 BPA WR, CB, Edge, OT, LB #64 BPA
Umm...Buffalo Do you really think they traded up to 12 for the hell if it? They've positioned themselves to make a move into the top 5..#2 is going to be expensive..
Won’t they trade only if their guy is there...that’s why I don’t get the Jets trade so early...what if Browns or NYG take their guy?
I'm sure they'll try...that's if the Jets don't beat them to it..they might not be done. Giants might have refused to move all the way to #6
IMHO, the Jets trading up could be VERY good news for the Browns. The only way it could be better is if Buffalo trades up to #2. If that trade up happens (along side the Jets trade up to #3), that means the Browns get the pick of the litter at BOTH #1 and #4! Obviously I'm assuming the Jets and Bills traded up to select a QB.
How can you not see the scenarios? Do we really need to explain every single one, every single time? The Jets may have (2) QBs they would be willing to move forward with, if both are gone, the move from 6 would be for naught. The Giants may not want a QB at all...Thus, if they want to ensure they get the guy they want, they either need to stay at #2, OR they could take a charity hand out by the Jets to move down one spot and still have their choice. The Jets still have #72...It is clear the Jets are positioning for a QB...So the Giants have no fear of losing their guy (as long as they aren't thinking QB obviously) Getting an extra early 3rd rounder for simply sliding down a spot doesn't match up to the trade chart, but who cares. They either take their guy at 2 or take their guy at 3 and get a free 3rd round draft pick. The question you should be asking is, why wouldn't they?
So what? It would make no significant difference from a base salary standpoint. The only difference is they would stroke someone's ego by picking them at #1 vs #4. And even that could be justified by the circumstances surrounding the two trade ups.
If you are taking a QB at #4...then take the QB at #1...That is some simple math there buddy... Take a non QB at #1 and don't get your choice of QBs at #4.... OR Take a QB at #1 and WHO EVER YOU WERE CONSIDERING TAKING INSTEAD OF THAT QB AT #1 IS STILL THERE AT #4... Come on stopper, I know you are just writing sentences to get a reaction...but these really don't make any sense.
Whoever the hell they want...the only way they don't get their top guy in that situation is if they wanted TWO QBs with their first two picks. The scenario was the Bills trading up to #2...Jets already at #3 That means ONE thing.. #1 QB #2 QB #3 QB #4 Who ever you want
Agree. Neither the Jets or the Bills would spend the draft assets to move up to 2 and 3 unless they were targeting a QB. Keep in mind that BOTH the Jets and Bills need a QB just as badly as do the Browns.
?????????????? WHAT ??????????????? The Giants would be trading down to #12 plus...I'm not saying the Giants are trading down to "get their guy", they are trading down for addition assets. The BROWNS would be getting THEIR guy at #4.. What are you disagreeing with?
