I don’t think you were elected to speak for him. And awesome I know you are but what am I you did there...even when the original insult wasn’t meant for you. Well done.
It might....but I’m still waiting for you to spout some truth. All you have at the moment is opinion. It’s somewhat said you don’t understand the difference between the two.
Wowie, anyone catch Ruth Badair Ginsburg interview blaming Hillary's loss on "Machoism" and "Sexism"? That the US is too male dominated? This from a Supreme Court judge? Golly. Good luck to all of those lawyers going before the SC now. For sure, if I am one of these lawyers, I just might ask for some RECUSALS of MS. Ginsburg for being biased against men? This is amazing to me. Perhaps, Ms. Ginsburg need to retire?
Wowie, anyone catch Ruth Badair Ginsburg interview blaming Hillary's loss on "Machoism" and "Sexism"? That the US is too male dominated? This from a Supreme Court judge? Golly. Good luck to all of those lawyers going before the SC now. For sure, if I am one of these lawyers, I just might ask for some RECUSALS of MS. Ginsburg for being biased against men? This is amazing to me. Perhaps, Ms. Ginsburg need to retire? Guess what, dipshit. I have a right to my opinion and you do not have a right as a decider of what is and isn't allowed here. Thanks for playing.
Express all the opinions you want. Stop saying your opinions are truth. Thanks for losing. Again. And again. And...you get it.
Everything that I said about Ginsburg is true, dummy. Trouble is that you very seldom speak the truth so you wouldn't know what it is. You calling me a COWARD is a pretty good example of what a liar that you are. Now THAT is my OPINION.
No, it wasn't. Wowie, anyone catch Ruth Badair Ginsburg interview blaming Hillary's loss on "Machoism" and "Sexism"? That the US is too male dominated? This from a Supreme Court judge? Golly. Good luck to all of those lawyers going before the SC now. For sure, if I am one of these lawyers, I just might ask for some RECUSALS of MS. Ginsburg for being biased against men? This is amazing to me. Perhaps, Ms. Ginsburg need to retire? I read her interview....there was nothing to suggest she's biased against men. Saying sexism played a role in Hillary's loss, whether you believe she's right or wrong, doesn't equal her being biased against men. Her commenting about #metoo doesn't make her biased against men. It's rather clear you have no idea how to separate facts and truth from your own opinions.
Sex always plays a role in everything except watching sports. How many times have you forgot an item at the grocery store because some hot looking babe walked by when you should have been selecting a product off the shelf. I am sure that woman run into other carts while checking out a bulge in the crotch of a mans pants.
You are really an idiot. That is exactly what she said. She blamed the loss on Machoism and Sexism on the part of men. No proof whatsoever to that claim. This displays a bias against men to say such a thing without and iota of proof. This is a Supreme Court Justice who is supposed to be fair to both sides in the courtroom. What she said absolutely displays a biased opinion against men.
That doesn’t display a bias against men. Just as saying there was no sexism doesn’t display a favoritism towards men. It’s simply an opinion. Her making opinionated comments in an interview does not mean she can’t be fair in a court room. But all this is coming from a guy that is 100% okay with biased judges....so long as they’re republicans. Heh.
Please explain your second sentence there, mensa? Is English your second language? You know, for one who attacks people for incoherence in speech and thought, maybe you need to judge yourself?
Forgot...I gotta dumb things down for you. I’m used to talking to people with a regular level of comprehension...I apologize for not Al-proofing my post and will try harder in the future to put things more at your level. I know you are but what am I refers to the old Peewee Herman joke...someone insults you...calls you a poopie head...and you say “I know you are, but what am I?”. And then it goes in circles. On a message board it’s brought up when someone copies you. I called cat an immature twit. And then you...lacking all originality...called me an immature twit. That’s an I know you are but what am I moment. You’re welcome for the lesson. Hopefully needing to read more than one paragraph didn’t result in a headache.
Your little mind cannot even see the bias in her words. The issue is that complaints are lodged all of the time by lawyers based on biased comments by judges. This is no different. mark my words, in the next case coming before the Supreme Court that involves any kind of issue between men and women, the attorney on the male side will argue that she recuse herself. It will happen and she will have to do it.
Gee, nimrod. You botched your sentence after your lame attempt at mocking me. Noone can understand what you meant by that second sentence because you cannot express yourself coherently.
My mind clearly doesn’t work like yours. By that I mean I don’t have the outrageously biased obsession against Dems and the ridiculous fear of liberals you do. So where you see bias against men...I just see a woman voicing an opinion. An opinion I don’t agree with....I don’t think Hillary lost due to sexism...but she’s entitled to an opinion. Judges are allowed to have opinions...that isn’t against the law. I’d like to take your word for things...but I won’t because I tend not to take advice from crazy people.
Could you explain which sentence I botched? And I clearly explained what the second sentence meant....even though the way it is typed should be clear to anyone not named Al in Cal.
Lesson? You cannot compose a sentence let alone a paragraph that makes a bit of sense. Your lame attempt to call on an old Peewee Herman joke is fucked up because you blew that thing also. Perhaps you ought to proof read your stuff before you make yourself the fool once more.
Could you elaborate on which sentence doesn’t make sense to you? I’m happy to help you learn. It’s okay to admit when you don’t know something...that’s how to gain knowledge.
You are too stupid to listen to anyone smarter than you which is a helluva lot of people including me. Also, I don't fear liberals. I laugh at liberals and their stupid ideas. As for an outrageous obsession against Dimms, they are losing and I am enjoying the hell out of it. This also is just not another woman "expressing an opinion", dummy. This is a fucking justice of the Supreme Court of the United States saying that men were sexist and exhibiting "macho" tendencies. This comment should exclude her form any rulings on cases that reflect those issues.
The Dems have actually gained a seat or seats lately...have they not? They’ve flipped like 36 seats since Trump took office. What are they losing? What is the GOP winning? The people losing are voters because the government just grows more powerful each day while the American people are sit and forced to watch a really bad soap opera play out in DC that both parties are staring in. Supreme Court justices are allowed to have opinions.
