aaaahh, you didn't get to see the little girl catching like Browns receivers? dang. that was the best part. I don't think im doin anything different than usual. They seem to be fine.
Well, must be something in Firefox, when I go into Chrome everything is fine...Just weird that the others show up fine, it was just TD's that didn't.
I have to use Firefox for a couple of things at work, so I just use it for most everything. It's easier to bookmark than Chrome also..
Good #Hosin'4Rosen #TeamLooksLikeChymosin4Rosen #Cozen4Rosen Chymosin (noun): an enzyme that occurs in gastric juice Cozen (verb): act with artful deceit
I, for one, am not yet ready to look to the NCAA for our next messiah. I do fear that MAYBE, just MAYBE, we got the 2016 DeShone Kizer instead of the 2015 version. I really don't worry about the inherent talent this kid posseses. But . . . I am starting to get a bit concerned about (1) what he has between the ears and his ability to learn from his mistakes and (2) whether or not Hue Jackson can actually help this kid mature on the field either through physically coaching out the mistakes or, at least, game planning the offense to minimize them. So far I don't see any evidence that Hue can do either.
So, I'll see you guys after a couple of Browns wins...I'm fucking tired of coming on here every time I get a notice of a new post and it's SAS bashing the CURRENT player(s)...It got old quick...enjoy. I have a few other places I go for Browns stuff that isn't constant whining. It's been fun...
Wow! I wasn't denegrating Kessler, simply pointing out that taking away the deep threat, impacts the O by allowing the D to crowd the line. I get it Kessler has / had better numbers, and I truly appreciate what he did well, like getting the team lined up correctly, playing to the team's and his strengths, and getting us out of bad plays, etc...., but he doesn't represent a "threat" to defenses, relative to having to cover the whole field. I believe Kizer does give us that, but is lacking / undevedoped in many of the other areas, where Kessler was / is better. I just don't think going forward he will ever be a franhise QB, and I hope / think Kizer may be. And, I want to find out. Now if you are arguing that Kizer should be pulled when he is struggling, and costing the team in a game, that's a different argument. I don't think Kizer has to be treated with kid gloves, like that, but at the same time, I think he has shown that he is capable of progressing and overcoming poor play early, to make games close. Unfortunately, he often / regularly has made another mistake to ruin our oppty to actually get the win. My point here is that he gives us the chance, and he crushes the chance, which IMO is what one should expect from a rookies QB. I was acctually hoping Kessler was going to be our starter, so Kizer could absorb and learn a little. Kessler failed to hold onto the position the coach gave him to start camp. It becomes hard to argue he should be the guy under those circumstances, and how can anyone explain him dropping to 3rd in line? Again, not a Kessler argument. Just an innocent comment that meant that I like Kizer going for it deep, and don't want to see that part of his / our gameplan, because it makes it easier on Ds, and because I want him to feel like he can make that play, not become Checkdown Charlie. Could he be a little more discerning, yeah, he could.